<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Blue Peter cat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eyedropper.co.uk/2007/09/20/the-blue-peter-cat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eyedropper.co.uk/2007/09/20/the-blue-peter-cat/</link>
	<description>Who do you believe, me or your own eyes? - Groucho Marx</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:19:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://eyedropper.co.uk/2007/09/20/the-blue-peter-cat/#comment-2996</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyedropper.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/the-blue-peter-cat/#comment-2996</guid>
		<description>They could give it a practical name and call it &#039;Rat Bastard&#039;. Then the mafia might shoot it - problem solved.

&quot;And now, here&#039;s Konnie with a report from Little Big Little Italy...&quot;

&quot;SQUUEEEE!!! I&#039;m actually OUTSIDE! SQUEEEEE! I LIKE KITTENS! SQUEE!!!! I&#039;m being SHOT AT!!! SQUEEE! THIS IS AMAZING!!!!&quot;

Not that the new Blue Peter is dumbing down at all... oh no...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They could give it a practical name and call it &#8216;Rat Bastard&#8217;. Then the mafia might shoot it &#8211; problem solved.</p>
<p>&#8220;And now, here&#8217;s Konnie with a report from Little Big Little Italy&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;SQUUEEEE!!! I&#8217;m actually OUTSIDE! SQUEEEEE! I LIKE KITTENS! SQUEE!!!! I&#8217;m being SHOT AT!!! SQUEEE! THIS IS AMAZING!!!!&#8221;</p>
<p>Not that the new Blue Peter is dumbing down at all&#8230; oh no&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://eyedropper.co.uk/2007/09/20/the-blue-peter-cat/#comment-2931</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyedropper.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/the-blue-peter-cat/#comment-2931</guid>
		<description>I actually think Hitler is a perfectly good name for a cat. If I had a cat I&#039;d call it Hitler. Or Bastard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually think Hitler is a perfectly good name for a cat. If I had a cat I&#8217;d call it Hitler. Or Bastard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Condon</title>
		<link>http://eyedropper.co.uk/2007/09/20/the-blue-peter-cat/#comment-2874</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Condon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyedropper.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/the-blue-peter-cat/#comment-2874</guid>
		<description>And now it seems that there was a perfectly good reason why the now-sacked editor chose to disregard &#039;Cookie&#039; and call the cat &#039;Socks&#039;. From the Guardian site:

&quot;There was some late surge for the name that was in second place. A group of people decided to [vote] on a multiple basis, clearly there was something fishy about it,&quot; the Blue Peter insider told MediaGuardian.co.uk.

&quot;He decided to go with the name that was leading [before the late surge of votes]. He decided that not on his own initiative but because he was alerted to it by technical people.&quot;

Cookie, the name that eventually won the viewers&#039; poll, was for most of the vote was in second place behind Socks, until the late surge, the source said.&quot;


So, yet again, another example of the BBC choosing to hammer nails into itself for no good reason. I give up, I really do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now it seems that there was a perfectly good reason why the now-sacked editor chose to disregard &#8216;Cookie&#8217; and call the cat &#8216;Socks&#8217;. From the Guardian site:</p>
<p>&#8220;There was some late surge for the name that was in second place. A group of people decided to [vote] on a multiple basis, clearly there was something fishy about it,&#8221; the Blue Peter insider told MediaGuardian.co.uk.</p>
<p>&#8220;He decided to go with the name that was leading [before the late surge of votes]. He decided that not on his own initiative but because he was alerted to it by technical people.&#8221;</p>
<p>Cookie, the name that eventually won the viewers&#8217; poll, was for most of the vote was in second place behind Socks, until the late surge, the source said.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, yet again, another example of the BBC choosing to hammer nails into itself for no good reason. I give up, I really do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maz</title>
		<link>http://eyedropper.co.uk/2007/09/20/the-blue-peter-cat/#comment-2849</link>
		<dc:creator>Maz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyedropper.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/the-blue-peter-cat/#comment-2849</guid>
		<description>http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cookie

Number 3. Though I wouldn&#039;t have even heard of it until all this came about and I looked it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cookie" rel="nofollow">http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cookie</a></p>
<p>Number 3. Though I wouldn&#8217;t have even heard of it until all this came about and I looked it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
